Surname: 3
and answers. He argued that he ought to do the right thing even if it was going against the law.
According to him, a command from God is of greater importance than the state's dictates.
Besides, Socrates refused to live a different life even as it meant losing his life.
Furthermore, he refused to escape death because that seemed like going against the law. He
further holds fast to his values and principles even during the trial. Plato, Socrates' student also
lived an examined life, evident as he stated that if he had money; he would have proposed a fine
though he did not have money (Julian). He went ahead to ascertain to his accusers that he would
not yield to any of them concerning anything wrong, even if it meant losing his life, just like
Socrates.
The argument by Socrates that unexamined life is not worth living has different
implications. When taken at the point of view of someone who neither knows nor does not care
to look for it, it is senseless. This is due to various people living a normal life happily and simple
without bothering to question what Socrates asked. However, when considered from a curious
person's point of view, it makes a lot of sense; when taken from an inquisitive person's
perspective, it is very sensible. This is because such people have the desire of understanding and
the passion of knowing the true wisdom. When such people live a life without pursuing true
wisdom, their lives seem unfulfilled (Stack).
Though Socrates argument makes a lot of sense, it is too bold for everybody to accept it
completely. This is because his thinking is based on those who have the knowledge and not
considering those who do not have the curiosity. It cannot be accepted ultimately because many
people live fulfilled and happy lives without questioning the happenings in the world. This
makes their life simpler, satisfying and peaceful, unlike Socrates who died for being inquisitive
and sticking to his principles.
