Virtue Ethics

Surname 1
Student’s Name
Professor
Course
Date
Virtue Ethics
Introduction
Virtue ethics encompasses theories that explain the role of a person's character in moral
philosophy. It rejects the notion of an individual doing their duty or taking action so that better
consequences can be achieved. It instead emphasizes individual character as the main component
of ethical thinking (Adams 21). Different philosophical perceptions put arguments about
people’s virtues. The paper expounds on the neutral stand exhibited by Aristotle in asserting that
people's virtues do not arise from nature, neither do they result from contrary to nature.
Aristotle argued that no absolute moral standards are known. Therefore, any theory
describing ethics has to be partly based on psychological concepts and more of the realities that
occur in daily lives and human nature (Lear 86). The moral values that people display are not by
nature per se neither do they come from other sources that contradict nature. Instead, Aristotle
highlighted that an individual achieves happiness by a virtuous life and developing reason in the
context of theoretical wisdom. In accomplishing this, a person needs enough external goods that
guarantee health, leisure and the ability to engage in virtuous action.
The philosophical view that describes the neutral position regarding the morality of
human beings is that virtuous acts need conscious choice and moral purpose (Annas 74). Certain
aspects of motivation have to come to play for people to show moral acts and human beings have
Surname 2
individual moral responsibility for their actions. Aristotle asserted that the highest good which
human activity is directed to is happiness (Lear 101). This continuously is the contemplation of
truth. That moral virtue is between the extremes of deficiency and excess, and overall, moral life
is when moderation is done in all things apart from virtue.
The theory of human nature presents practical consequences. People can go ‘natural' or
‘technological' when it comes to parenting, for example. Factual evidence indicates that people
exhibit differences when engaging in various activities as to be that proposed by Hobbes or
Rousseau. Since the two philosophers argued on the aspects of people being naturally wicked or
good respectively, it does not seem accurate to reason that people are on either the extremes. It is
not possible to achieve moral virtue abstractly. It calls for a social environment with ethical
action. Aristotle highlighted that there is a close relation between ethics and politics since
politics is the science responsible for creating a society where people can live the good life and
endeavor to achieve their full potential (Lear 121).
Virtue ethicists describe a distinction between perfect virtue and the strength of will.
Those who are entirely virtuous perform their obligations without struggling against contrary
desires (Adams 33). Conversely, the ‘continent' has exercised some control over a desire or
temptation in doing otherwise. This shows that some people are morally good in their natural
being while others can become virtuous despite their internal conflicts and objections. It is also
not easy to harmonize a person’s emotions with their rational recognition of particular reasons
behind the action.
In conclusion, virtue ethics is a critical concept in ethical thinking, and it can have varied
philosophical opinions. The philosophers have put their arguments based on the human character
and Aristotle, gave a more vivid description, especially regarding moral ethics. The notion that
Surname 3
people are good generally by nature does not conform well to the observations that are made on
daily lives. Some appear good but internally hold different opinions. The opposite is true.
Therefore, a neutral stand, as expounded by Aristotle, stands a better chance in describing virtue
ethics.
Surname 4
Works cited
Adams, Robert Merrihew. A theory of virtue: Excellence in being for good. Clarendon Press,
2008.
Annas, Julia. "Virtue ethics." The Oxford handbook of ethical theory. Oxford University Press,
2009.
Lear, Gabriel Richardson. Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's"
Nicomachean Ethics." Princeton University Press, 2009.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.