Week 6-technical-BPA---

P&G – PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY

Page 1 of 6

Version: 1.0

System Requirements Specification (SRS)

Version Date: 29 November 2017

System Implementation and Development R & D

Author (s):

1. OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2

2. OUTSTANDING ISSUES ................................................................................................................................................... 2

3. ASSUMPTIONS AND DEPENDENCIES ...................................................................................................................................... 2

4. SYSTEM FEATURES ......................................................................................................................................................... 3

A. PLANNING SYSTEM FEATURES .............................................................................................................................................. 3

B. PRODUCTION SYSTEM FEATURES .......................................................................................................................................... 3

C. USER INTERFACES ................................................................................................................................................................. 3

SAFETY REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................................................. 5

SECURITY REQUIREMENTS.......................................................................................................................................................... 5

SOFTWARE QUALITY ATTRIBUTES.............................................................................................................................................. 5

8. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................................... 6

P&G – PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY

Page 2 of 6

Version: 1.0

System Requirements Specification (SRS)

Version Date: 29 November 2017

System Implementation and Development R & D

Author (s):

1. Objectives

This specification documents the system-level requirements for the P &G ERP system.

The objectives of this specification of the P&G ERP system are to:

1. Provide a system overview of the P&G Research and Development including definition, goals,

objectives, context, and major capabilities.

2. To formally specify it’s associations:

 Functional requirements

 Data requirements

 Quality requirements

 Constraints

2. Outstanding Issues

None

3. Assumptions and Dependencies

The following Assumptions and Dependencies are applicable for this SRS:

• The system will be used by experienced users from each of the Enterprise Systems that have a deep

understanding of existing operations.

• Provide connected design capabilities, integrating requirements, mechanics, electronics, software

components, and simulation, as well as synchronizing all downstream product development needs

internally and externally

• Manage flexible, high-performing, and ease-of-use configuration and classification for product

individualization

• Integrate and validate compliance requirements in the development process and manage product

declarations as part of the product properties for all variants across the product supply chain and

lifecycle

P&G – PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY

Page 3 of 6

Version: 1.0

System Requirements Specification (SRS)

Version Date: 29 November 2017

System Implementation and Development R & D

Author (s):

4. System Features

The P&G ERP system has features and capabilities that were not available on previous midrange

systems. Primary features include the ability to partition product development scheduling and

departmental roles. These features provide greater reliability, availability, and serviceability, which

means uptime. The following section are adopted in the system:

A. Planning System Features

The first stage of product development at P&G R&D planning. The raw material and packaging

material for R&D department are defined and assigned code that will be used in purchase and issue

during production. This point is executed at the Supply chain management department

B. Production System Features

Batch manufacturing record is prepared and bill of material for each product uploaded in the SAP.

Production co-coordinator facilitate batch opening and issue of material at the raw material

warehouse

C. User Interfaces

The system is greatly user friendly with predefined coding language for the system. However the users

are equipped with MySQL programming prior to running the ERP system.

P&G – PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY

Page 4 of 6

Version: 1.0

System Requirements Specification (SRS)

Version Date: 29 November 2017

System Implementation and Development R & D

Author (s):

System user interface at the planning stage, Batch manufacturing record management

User interface at the production site of R&D at Proctor & Gamble manufacturing plant

P&G – PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY

Page 5 of 6

Version: 1.0

System Requirements Specification (SRS)

Version Date: 29 November 2017

System Implementation and Development R & D

Author (s):

Safety Requirements

 Assign ownership for the implementation project

 Thoroughly define your requirements, goals and priorities for the ERP implementation

 Ensure communication across the whole business on what you are doing and why

 Set realistic expectations for the outcome

Security Requirements

Each user will have special account logins and limited rights as per his/her department. Project

Manager will have the highest level of rights to the system, although some code/registry access rights

will be kept solely with program vendor.

Software Quality Attributes

Quality attribute

Definition

Agility

The ability of a system to both be flexible and undergo change rapidly.

Flexibility

The ease with which a system or component can be modified for use in applications or

environments, other than those for which it was specifically designed.

Interoperability

The ability of two or more systems or components to exchange information and use the

information that has been exchanged.

Performance

The responsiveness of the system—that is, the time required to respond to stimuli

(events) or the number of events processed in some interval of time. Performance

P&G – PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY

Page 6 of 6

Version: 1.0

System Requirements Specification (SRS)

Version Date: 29 November 2017

System Implementation and Development R & D

Author (s):

qualities are often expressed by the number of transactions per unit time, or by the

amount of time that it takes to complete a transaction with the system.

Reliability

The ability of the system to keep operating over time. Reliability is usually measured by

mean time to failure.

Scalability

The ability to maintain or improve performance while system demand increases.

Security

A measure of the system's ability to resist unauthorized attempts at usage and denial of

service, while still providing its services to legitimate users. Security is categorized in

terms of the types of threats that might be made to the system.

Supportability

The ease with which a software system can be operationally maintained.

8. Acceptance Criteria

R&D and functional consultants of each ERP feature team to create performance metrics that are

linked to the business measurements of the project processes they support. Work with the IT

implementation side of your ERP team (internal + vendor) to create simple process optimization

success measurements for each environment and each module.

9. Change

Interfaces+before+

and+After Stephen.ppsx

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

Paper type

Deadline

Page count

550 words

Total price: $ 15.00

Our customers say

Jeff Curtis

USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Ian McGregor

UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Shannon Williams

Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."