Why Employee Stock Ownership Plan companies are more profitable than traditionally owned companies

Running head: WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE
PROFITABLE THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 1
Why Employee Stock Ownership Plan companies are more profitable than traditionally
owned companies
Name
Institution
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 2
Table of Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3
Purpose of the study .................................................................................................................... 4
What ESOP is and how ESOP works ............................................................................................. 4
ESOP rules ...................................................................................................................................... 6
Why employee stock ownership plan companies are profitable that the traditionally owned
corporations..................................................................................................................................... 7
Benefits of ESOP .......................................................................................................................... 10
Comparison between ESOP and non ESDOP companies ............................................................ 12
Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 20
Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 21
References ..................................................................................................................................... 23
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 3
Thesis statement
A comprehensive analysis of why Employee Stock Ownership Plan companies are more
profitable than traditionally owned companies.
Introduction
Employee Stock ownership plan (ESOP) is a concept that has widely gained prominence
globally among for-profit making companies. The concept has received immense acceptance in
most companies from both employees and managers. They cite that it is a viable and noble step
towards consolidating resources and fostering growth in the companies. Employees like the
concept as it gives them the opportunity to become shareholders thereby form part of the
company ownership. The companies also prefer the aspect of financial consolidation given that
they remain in control of the contributions made on behalf of the employees.
ESOP is a retirement plan where the company makes contributions to a trust unit based
on pre-determined amounts on behalf of employees to buy stock or shares. The shares can be for
the company where they work. That is the contributions are aimed at making employees part of
the company ownership by shareholding. The plan is executed purposely to serve employees
well and benefit them. As noted by Katz (2014), it is one sure way that employees can use to
gain part of the company shares and contribute in the decision-making process. Likewise, it is an
innovative way of motivating employees by attaching them to the company. The move makes
them feel part of the company thereby ignite a sense of dedication and determination to giving
the best (Grossman, 2015). Everything they do under such circumstances is characterized by
immense diligence, ethical values, and determination towards achieving the best results. This
paper provides comprehensive information on why companies that offer employee stock
ownership plan ESOPs are more profitable than the traditionally owned companies.
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 4
Purpose of the study
The analysis is purposefully meant to create awareness and understanding on why
companies that embrace ESOPs perform better or record higher profitability levels as compared
to the traditionally owned companies. The information is vital as it will help in influencing
decision-making in many institutions. It is bound to enlighten managers about the relevance of
the ESOP and why its adoption is necessary for the current century. The discussion will also
affirm or assert the concept’s ability to turn around performance in companies through its socio-
economic and cultural impact.
The target groups that the information is intended to reach include managers, employees,
company owners and investors. The study is to sharpen managers thinking and decision-making
regarding ESOPs. It aims at influencing those who have not adopted the concept to consider it
without undue delay. Likewise, it is a better way of advancing their knowledge on how to
improve and stabilize performance. For employees, the information aims at asserting the fact that
they can become owners of the companies where they work. They can be part of the ownership
and decision-making team under the structure.
Similarly, the information aims at sensitizing the employees about their ability to
accumulate wealth as they work through the ESOPs program. Credible awareness is equally
bound to be created particularly on the need for companies to embrace ESOP through the
comparative analysis between an ESOP and traditionally owned corporation.
What ESOP is and how ESOP works
As noted, ESOP is a retirement plan or a savings scheme or trust unit that is beneficial to
employees. The plan is managed by the company that the employee is attached including the
necessary contributions. The money remitted to the plan belongs to the employees and they can
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 5
access it upon retirement or when in need. In most cases, employees collect their returns after
retirement to enable them to cope and sustain their lives. ESOP accounts are managed on behalf
of the employees under a structured system (Chin, 2015). The system is characterized by
accountability and responsiveness to the owners’ needs. The plan provides the employees with
an excellent opportunity to own the company shares that in turn give them the authority to
participate in critical decision-making processes.
ESOP works differently given that the accomplishment of employee ownership is
possible in diverse ways. The first method is where employees participate in buying the stocks
directly, through bonus issuance, receipt of stock options and a designated profit sharing plan
(Chin, 2015). The plans differ in context, but the result is the achievement of company
ownership. Evidently, some employees gain company ownership through worker cooperatives
that encourage equal voting rights while others embrace the ESOP system. From 1974, many
companies prefer the ESOP system and US companies are leading in the number of institutions
offering the program.
Over 13.5 million employees are under the program in the US and they are benefiting
greatly. The companies that embrace ESOP use it to motivate and reward employees, use the
money to acquire new assets cheaply or without the attachment of tax and provide readily
available share market (Chin, 2015). The ESOP provides the share market for the shares of the
departed owners of companies with closely held shares. Therefore, ESOP is a working concept
that any institution that seeks to consolidate its gains should not ignore especially in the current
competitive business environment.
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 6
ESOP rules
ESOP is a plan that is executed under strict standards and guidelines. The guidelines help
in streamlining its functioning and ensure that employees including the company get value for
money. Utz (2016) affirms that the rules promote accountability and credibility in the handling
of the resources. The level of accountability ensures that no amount of employee remittances is
delayed, no amount is lost, and every record of cash outflow and inflow is protected. The first
rule is that the company must have a trust fund where the contributions of new shares are
directed including those used in buying the existing shares. The company can borrow the money
contributed through formal systems to buy new shares or the existing ones (Locke, 2015). After
successful borrowing, the company is under obligation to pay cash contributions to the plan to
facilitate the loan repayment. To promote sanity, all the contributions are subjected to tax
deductions but within specific limits.
The next rule is that the allocation of shares in the trust unit is done to employee accounts
directly despite the existence of some exceptions. The allocations are done based on the
individual's relative pay amount or a balanced formula and seniority. Seniority applies given that
as the employees rise through the corporate ladder, their terms of work and benefits change (Utz,
2016). The changes must be reflected to increase the individuals’ benefits in the long run since
they also acquire the right to receiving more shares in their accounts. The process is normally
known as vesting, and every employee must be 100% vested. The process is scheduled in most
cases to take three to six years depending on whether the vesting is done gradually or once.
The rules also spell out how employees receive their shares or money when they retire or
in need. The procedure is that they must get back their shares through a buyout by the company
at the fair market value (Locke, 2015). For private companies, the share price is determined in an
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 7
annual outside valuation while in public companies employees allocate shares through voting on
the main issues. Despite the vote, the company reserves the choice on whether to pass voting
rights on the issues or not.
Why employee stock ownership plan companies are profitable that the traditionally owned
corporations
It is inevitably clear that ESOP companies report higher revenues and performance than
the traditionally owned companies. The exemplary performance in ESOP companies is
attributable to their model of operation, structural system and the incentives that are provided
(Utz, 2016). ESOP companies do everything within their power to ensure that every stakeholder
is satisfied from the community, employees, and suppliers among others. They engage in fruitful
deliberations that promote creativity and innovation during strategy formulation. The first reason
why ESOP companies record higher performance rates than the traditionally owned corporations
is that they are democratically managed and flexible.
The companies are managed under democratic structures that promote good relations
between the stakeholders such as employees, the management, investors, and suppliers.
According to Locke (2015), the structures provide clear channels of communication that is
necessary for sharing of ideas among team members. Regarding flexibility, the companies
operate under flexible policies that are adjustable to meet the changing needs and environmental
changes as compared to the traditionally owned corporations. The second reason is that the
ESOP companies allow employees to become owners through share purchasing. Most companies
do not allow this as they cite that conflict of interest may arise; however, ESOP entities do it
professionally (Katz, 2014).
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 8
The companies give employees the opportunity to have shares that are normally being
bought back at fair market values when one is retiring from service. The aspect makes employees
feel happy and part of the company as compared to those of the traditionally owned entities that
rarely have little to be proud of. They feel that the company is theirs and every effort undertaken
can either make everyone lose or gain. Therefore, they strive to give their best to ensure that
outstanding outcomes are attained in all business units hence the growth in profitability. The next
reason why ESOP companies record better performance is the availability of the retirement plan
that is managed on behalf of the employees (Grossman, 2015). The plan is beneficial to the
employees, and they like the fact that employers make the contributions. The plan instills a
feeling of togetherness that inspires hope, motivates employees and ignites credible reasons to
act with determination. The level of motivation that fosters exemplary performance is unique in
the ESOP companies as compared to the traditionally owned corporations thereby explaining the
differences.
ESOP companies also lay off workers less often as compared to traditionally owned
institutions. The aspect translates into their good performance since they can have employees
who are nurtured, trained and committed to delivering quality results. The longer they stay with
the employees, the deeply rooted they get accustomed to the entity’s ethical guidelines, cultural
practices and the functioning of the business model (Chin, 2015). The entrenched employees
operate with fewer complications or report minimal mistakes as compared to institutions that
report higher rates of employee turnover as it takes time for the new staff to catch up.
Another driver of profitability of the ESOP companies is the connection with the locals
and community members. ESOP companies contribute towards improving the community
welfare by assisting to stabilize the local community economic base. The local participation is
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 9
achievable through a defined mechanism that allows local owners to cash out money or shares
upon retirement without the company getting affected financially (Grossman, 2015). The
community members are equally accorded a stake in the company, and they participate in
decision-making processes, a factor that is not common in the traditionally owned companies.
ESOP companies perform better because they provide greater opportunities for
employees than traditionally owned companies. The opportunities include higher wage earnings,
retirement income, participation in decision-making processes, and community involvement in
local assets management or control as compared to other entities (Daines, 2015). Similarly, the
accountability and credibility levels with which various activities are managed in the ESOP
companies influence their good performance compared to others. ESOP companies have viable
structures and action plans that stakeholders are not skeptical about in most cases. They do their
work knowing that their welfare is protected optimally. The aspect motivates them and
influences their good performance. Another key performance driver in ESOP companies is the
ability to mobilize funds internally and externally.
Foremost, the companies consolidate their resources given that they do not lose funds to
external trust units. They have trust units through which they channel the employee
contributions. The approach means that the money remains within. The companies can borrow
the contributions made to buy new or existing shares and to have money readily available to
repay an existing loan. The aspect of internal borrowing allows them to expand their investments
through a less costly source of capital. The strategy is beneficial and profitable since it eliminates
the expense that is associated with the cost of capital and many formal procedures required for
external borrowing. It instead ensures that money is readily available for usage when an
opportunity presents itself.
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 10
Indeed, the points indicate clearly that ESOP companies are more beneficial than the
traditionally owned entities. They are also profitable based on the evident incentives than their
counterparts.
Benefits of ESOP
ESOP is an investment plan that presents immense benefits to various stakeholders in
companies. The plan benefits companies, directly and indirectly, employees, the community and
even investors among other groups of people. For companies, the plan helps in achieving
tremendous progress structurally, financially and in policy making. The first benefit is that ESOP
concept help companies to double or triple their performance/profitability (Katz, 2014). The
concept provides requisite incentives that motivate quality output and employee participation in
sustaining value chain systems.
Companies that embrace ESOP have motivated employees who work with passion and
determination. They offer best customer care services, adhere to the ethical guidelines and ensure
that resources are used amicably. ESOP companies are also able to raise more capital for
expansion cheaply. The ability to raise cash easily is a huge advantage to the companies as
compared to traditionally owned corporations. The funds that are generated from the employee
contributions help them to buy new and existing shares and finance various projects.
Similarly, ESOP facilitates creativity, innovation, and teamwork in organizations. The
plan achieves this courtesy of its ability to bring people together, foster understanding and create
a sense of belonging among the stakeholders. The feeling that the company is ours leads to the
formation of working teams with the aim of attaining specific goals. People come together in the
working teams, share ideas and develop new ones out of creativity and innovation. The ideas are
used in propelling performance. The companies also benefit from the deeply-rooted attachment
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 11
that they have with the employees. The concept assists in ensuring that the trained employees
who understand the ethical values and operating standards continue to serve without
interruptions that normally create performance gaps.
According to Katz (2014), ESOP is beneficial to companies as it helps in creating a good
relationship between the community members and the company. The cordial relationship asserts
the company’s acceptance among community members that attracts goodwill from the public.
Any company that seeks to operate with minimal complications must have the community’s
acceptance. Without their involvement and support, quality performance cannot be achieved as
evident in the ESOP companies (Daines, 2015). Likewise, ESOP concept enables companies to
buy shares from the departing owners at the fair market value. The purchasing of shares ensures
that the stocks are consolidated and used to better services going forward.
Employees benefit greatly from ESOP plan in various companies. The first benefit is that
the plan enables them to accumulate wealth and grow financially. It gives them the opportunity
to own shares that are issued after retirement. The money or contributions made is accumulated
in their specific accounts for accountability (Daines, 2015). The second benefit is that they can
participate in their respective company decision-making processes. The concept allows them to
have shares that in turn make them significant company owners whose decisions count.
They participate in decision-making by virtue of their position as employees and
shareholders. EOSP concept is equally beneficial to the employees as it allows them to work
under favorable terms and conditions (Katz, 2014). ESOP employees are paid well, earn more
wages, retirement income and gain promotions to higher positions. The terms of work are
encouraging as compared to employees who work in other companies. ESOP guarantees
individuals or employees access to their money or shares after retirement.
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 12
Comparison between ESOP and non ESDOP companies
This section provides a comparative analysis of two companies that are known as WinCo
Foods and Weis Markets, Inc. The comparative aspect is based on ESOP concept that aids
performance in most institutions. One of the companies operates a vibrant ESOP plan while the
other works under the traditionally owned company concept. The aim of the analysis is to show
the difference between ESOP companies and non-ESOP entities regarding profitability including
general performance.
Indeed, WinCo Foods Company is a fast growing chain store or supermarket that is
located in Arizona, US (Jensen & Phillips, 2015). The American based supermarket has grown
from strength to strength since its inception in the year 1967. It has expanded its distribution
networks, increased business units, product portfolio and profitability. The company has also
increased its employees’ numbers to 15,000 people. The exemplary performance is attributable
to the effective operating strategy, marketing plans, product quality and above all the ESOP
program (Jensen & Phillips, 2015). The company is privately held, and the employees own
majority shares. The ESOP concept has acted as a genuine motivation to the employees who in
turn have been giving their best to the company. Their work has been excellent over the years.
They have helped the company to expand its profitability index to over 4.73 billion and business
units to over 107 internally and externally. Its financial performance has been increasing yearly.
The company performs better that Weis Markets company that was formed in the year
1912. The company whose shares are owned by the three brothers has been focusing its energies
on providing food items and other valuable to consumers. The Mid-Atlantic Food Retailer
operates several business units that contribute to its overall performance (In Hammoudi, et al.,
2015). It has not been doing badly either from the first date of operation; however, the
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 13
performance has not been stable as compared to that of WinCo Foods Company. The variance in
performance is shown in the charts below. This first chart shows WinCo’s performance trend
while the second one shows Weis Company performance trend.
WinCo Company
https://www.google.com/search?q=Weis+Markets+Company+financial+statements&client=firefox-b-
ab&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwip-
9Wo98HQAhXIsI8KHWIoDiwQ_AUICSgC&biw=1366&bih=635#imgrc=fBE7c41f2ygQFM%3A
Graph 2: Weis Markets Company
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 14
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-
ab&biw=1366&bih=635&noj=1&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=winco+company+financial+performance+graphs&o
q=winco+company+financial+performance+graphs&gs_l=img.3...396988.402447.0.403369.14.13.0.0.0.0
.665.1328.5-2.2.0....0...1c.1.64.img..12.0.0.-IqqFahGmSY#imgrc=V34NC6B5HuDl7M%3A
Subsequently, significant growth has been recorded but more needs to be done. Its
financial performance stands at $2.8 billion as at 2015 and 2.7 billion as at 2014 as compared to
the WinCo’s revenue base of over $4.7billion (In Hammoudi, et al., 2015). Despite that it has
been reporting varying figures over the years due to some operational challenges. One of the
challenges includes lack of motivated employees. The employees are not highly motivated as
compared to those of WinCo Foods company thereby affect the commitment to the provision of
quality services.
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 15
From the accounting or financial statements, it is clear that the two companies have had
different performance trends. WinCo has had a steady growth to date as compared to Weis
Markets Company as shown above. The trend is worrying for Weis Company as this year also
they have been recording inconstant progress. The inconsistency in performance is shown in the
chart below.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-
ab&biw=1280&bih=671&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=Weis+Markets+Company+financial+statements&
oq=Weis+Markets+Company+financial+statements&gs_l=img.12...4595971.4605875.0.460784
7.33.23.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0....0...1c.1.64.img..33.0.0.v27YnqYskvs&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.&bvm=bv.139
782543,d.ZGg&dpr=1&ech=1&psi=efs2WIL4J8fegAa4rYPwBg.1480007815357.3&ei=efs2WI
L4J8fegAa4rYPwBg&emsg=NCSR&noj=1#imgrc=1D-QevmeCCC0-M%3A
WinCOCompany also records more sales and changes in asset value than Weis
MarketsCompany. The variance depicts that WinCo is doing the right thing at the right time that
would include the use of innovative sales strategies as compared to Weis Company that seems to
record fluctuating figures. The changes are shown in the financial statement below. For example,
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 16
total assets for Weis Company stood at $1,235.959, $1,191.119 and $1,148.2419 in 2015, 2014
and 2013 respectively while WinCo recorded an asset base of $6,878.966 in the year 2014 and
6.591.118 in the year 2013 respectively(Jensen & Phillips, 2015). The differences show the
performance variance between the two companies. Other aspects of performance can equally be
established from the reports below. The first statement is for WinCo Foods Company and the
second one is for Weis Markets, Inc.
1
st
statement (WinCo’s Balance Sheet Statement)
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 17
2
nd
statement (Weis Markets Balance Sheet Statement)
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 18
Assets (mil)
2015
2014
2013
Current Assets
Cash
$17.596
$22.986
$17.965
Net Receivables
$88.083
$70.642
$57.193
Inventories
$229.399
$239.641
$240.452
Other Income Assets
$17.198
$0
$0
Total Current Assets
$454.65
$434.393
$404.748
Net Fixed Assets
$738.985
$716.86
$704.985
Other Noncurrent Assets
$7.162
$4.704
$3.347
Total Assets
$1,235.959
$1,191.119
$1,148.2419
Liabilities (mil)
2015
2014
2013
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable
$160.441
$144.812
$133.568
Short Term Debt
$
$
$
Other Current Liabilities
$6.898
$12.52
$12.903
Liability Summary
Total Current Liabilities
$221.928
$210.617
$193.22
Long Term Debt
$
$
$
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
$30.896
$3.242
$5.934
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 19
Total Liabilities
$364.212
$333.287
$314.189
Stakeholder's Equity (mil)
2015
2014
2013
Equity
Preferred Stock Equity
$
$
$
Common Stock Equity
$9.949
$9.949
$9.949
Equity Summary
Total Equity
$871.747
$857.832
$834.053
Shares Outstanding
26.9
26.9
26.9
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 20
Summary
This section provides a detailed summary of the information that is contained in the
paper. It covers fundamental points about ESOP concept, its application in companies, the rules
governing its application, and how it works, comparative analysis of two companies.
Subsequently, the section covers the key reasons why ESOP companies perform better than
traditionally owned corporations.
Apparently, many companies that embrace ESOPs record exemplary performance in all
dimensions as compared to the traditionally owned corporations. They manage their affairs
effectively, attend to customers well, produce quality products and remain competitive. Such
companies rarely record losses given that their books are always positive due to the increased
sales levels. It must be noted that most companies that embrace the practice are for-profit
entities. The companies adopt the practice as a strategy for improving performance and ensuring
satisfaction to all stakeholders. They also embrace it as a way of maximizing the available
resources by making sure that the employee contributions to such schemes are not remitted to
other entities but within its circles.
Most managers affirm that the growth in profitability that they recorded is as a result of
the stable relationship between the companies and employees. The relationship creates a sense of
belonging that motivate employees to offer their best in everything they do. In the process,
customers get satisfied, and in turn, sales increase thus flexes the profitability index upwards.
Such companies are highly competitive as compared to the traditionally owned entities that do
not entirely embrace the concept. The traditionally owned companies find it hard to cope with
the level of competition in the industries of operation. The aspect is apparent in the comparative
analysis between WinCo Company and Weis Markets, Inc. WinCo Company records steady
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 21
performance than xx that seems to be struggling. The exemplary performance is attributable to
the adoption of ESOP concept.
The implementation of ESOP is based on clear-cut guidelines and rules. The rules
facilitate the realization of sanity regarding the handling of various issues relating to employee
contributions. Some of the rules include the requirement that the companies must have a trust
fund, borrowings must be done through a formal procedure, loan paybacks must be done in time,
and employee contributions must be protected until retirement when buyout takes place at the
fair market value.
Conclusion
It is justifiable to conclude that ESOP presents tremendous benefits to companies and
employees including other stakeholders. The benefits range from socio-economic and cultural
achievements. In particular, many companies record improved performance due to the ESOP
concept. The companies that embrace the concept record the high amount of revenues as
compared to those that operate under traditional guidelines. The companies also provide quality
products and services that promote sales including customer numbers. Performance in ESOP
companies always advances due to the incentives and opportunities that the concept provides.
The incentives and opportunities motivate further effort in employees and other
stakeholders to work diligently. They also facilitate innovation and teamwork in companies that
remain key drivers of competitiveness in the dynamic business environment. Teamwork is
necessary for any organization to meet its objectives. It guarantees good relations, sharing of
ideas and strategic communication that is good for quality business engagement. The fact that
ESOP aids effective participation of employees in decision-making is a great achievement since
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 22
it helps in building strong companies. Employee involvement in such processes ensures holistic
implementation of the quality decisions made.
Likewise, ESOP is appropriate for companies given that accountability and strict
guidelines characterize its management. The guidelines avert any form of misappropriation;
promote effective deduction of tax amounts and management of employee accounts. The benefits
influence productivity in the organizations as evident in WinCo Foods and Weis Markets
companies.
WHY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPANIES ARE MORE PROFITABLE
THAN TRADITIONALLY OWNED COMPANIES 23
References
Chin, F. (2015). How Does an Employee-Owned Company Work?. Retrieved from,
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/employeeowned-company-work-44184.html
Daines, K. W. (2015). IRS guidance allows pre-approved ESOPs and cash balance plans.
Journal of Pension Benefits, 23(1), 47-48.
Grossman, J, (2015). Heed Vital Guidance on ESOP Valuation Provided in Greatbanc Trust.
Valuation Strategies, 18(3), 4-11,47-48.
In Hammoudi, A., In Grazia, C., In Surry, Y., & In Traversac, J.-B.(2015). Food safety, market
organization, trade and development. New York: Springer.
Jensen, C & Phillips, P. (2015). ESOPs in Canada: How to Implement an Employee Share
Ownership Plan to Grow ... New York: Friesen Press.
Katz, H. (2014). ESOPs: A Path To Increasing a Company’s Sales, Profitability, Employee
Satisfaction and Job Security. Retrieved from,
http://www.foxrothschild.com/publications/esops-a-path-to-increasing-a-
company%E2%80%99s-sales-profitability-employee-satisfaction-and-job-security/
Locke, D. (2015). An ESOP Can Lead to More Productive, Satisfied Employees. Retrieved from,
http://www.mossadams.com/articles/2015/september/esop-exit-strategy-with-tax,-
retirement-benefits
Utz, J. L. (2016). Employee stock ownership plans: Legal and regulatory update. Journal of
Pension Planning and Compliance, 42(1), 16-64.

Place new order. It's free, fast and safe

-+
550 words

Our customers say

Customer Avatar
Jeff Curtis
USA, Student

"I'm fully satisfied with the essay I've just received. When I read it, I felt like it was exactly what I wanted to say, but couldn’t find the necessary words. Thank you!"

Customer Avatar
Ian McGregor
UK, Student

"I don’t know what I would do without your assistance! With your help, I met my deadline just in time and the work was very professional. I will be back in several days with another assignment!"

Customer Avatar
Shannon Williams
Canada, Student

"It was the perfect experience! I enjoyed working with my writer, he delivered my work on time and followed all the guidelines about the referencing and contents."

  • 5-paragraph Essay
  • Admission Essay
  • Annotated Bibliography
  • Argumentative Essay
  • Article Review
  • Assignment
  • Biography
  • Book/Movie Review
  • Business Plan
  • Case Study
  • Cause and Effect Essay
  • Classification Essay
  • Comparison Essay
  • Coursework
  • Creative Writing
  • Critical Thinking/Review
  • Deductive Essay
  • Definition Essay
  • Essay (Any Type)
  • Exploratory Essay
  • Expository Essay
  • Informal Essay
  • Literature Essay
  • Multiple Choice Question
  • Narrative Essay
  • Personal Essay
  • Persuasive Essay
  • Powerpoint Presentation
  • Reflective Writing
  • Research Essay
  • Response Essay
  • Scholarship Essay
  • Term Paper
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using this website you are accepting the use of cookies mentioned in our Privacy Policy.